This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The photo of the bridge shows what appears to be a road on the end of the bridge where the photo was taken, but seems to show no road on the other end. Is there a road there? What road is it, if any? What "path" is it if it's not a road? And if the deck is only 15 feet wide, I would gather it's a single-lane bridge. Also, it would be nice to explain or link to what "EFP" stands for, rather than just assume the reader knows. I sure don't. There is a Wikipedia page listing various things "EFP" may stand for, but none of them are related to bridges. One guess would be "erected for pedestrians", but if that's the case, it should be explained outright.2601:545:8201:6290:95A6:8845:703D:169F (talk) 09:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
