![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baron Culloden
editI have always wondered about this subsidiary title. Is it really a reference to the Battle of Culloden? Does that seem like terrible PR to anybody else? Surely anything which reminds Jacobite sympathizers or patriotic highlanders of that battle can only serve to make for awkwardness; you'd think that they'd have tried to put it behind them! Or can there be some other reason why Culloden, Scotland merits use as a subsidary title? Doops 20:04, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Line of Succesion
editDoesn't the Duke of Kent and his descendents follow in the line of succession of this dukedom? The Prince George, 1st Duke Duke of Kent was the younger brother of The Prince Henry, 1st Duke of Gloucester, I think they follow on the line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.203.192.134 (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Duke of Gloucester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080319081431/http://www.ukdukes.co.uk:80/the_dukes/the_duke_of_gloucester/ to http://www.ukdukes.co.uk/the_dukes/the_duke_of_gloucester/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Query
editI wonder what is involved with this dukedom, beyond the title itself. Are any properties or customs connected to it? Or are all of the dukes of this line expected to provide their own income independent of both the civil list & any royal estates? (I know I'm confused in my terminology, but I'm groping after an answer deep in ignorance.) -- llywrch (talk) 09:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)