Talk:Dubai Waterfront
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
pictures
editwe need pictures people —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cody6 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC).
Merger
editI agree with the merger--88.104.141.108 (talk) 21:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dubai Waterfront. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060701032721/http://www.funonthenet.in:80/content/view/127/31/ to http://www.funonthenet.in/content/view/127/31/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dubai Waterfront. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060619195059/http://www.ameinfo.com/52861.html to http://www.ameinfo.com/52861.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.funonthenet.in/content/view/127/31/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Needs updating since 2013?!
editWow, this site really has fallen on hard times. This is about the 50th notice I've seen on an article dating from that same exact year. If you have time to tag an article in that fashion, SURELY you have the time to improve it yourself? This pathetic "leave a notice then move on" tactic seems to be far too common on Wikipedia. It's like lazy morons who throw their rubbish on the ground, presuming that someone is eventually going to come along and clean it up - even though that's not how life works at all. I think I might remove the notice actually, since clearly nobody cares enough to actually do anything about it. 1.157.95.133 (talk) 16:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- The time it took for you to write this comment could've been spent improving the article, but of course 'lazy morons' would rather throw rubbish on the ground hoping that someone was eventually going to come along and clean up... anyways, Wikipedia is run by volunteers and not everyone has the time to revamp an article Jolielover (talk) 08:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)