Talk:Dracula (1931 English-language film)

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Doniago in topic Faked lobby card

Page move

edit

This page was moved from "Dracula (1931 movie)" to "Dracula (1931 film)" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films)Ianblair23 (talk) 11:39, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Appearance of Dracula

edit

The now-iconic depiction of Dracula with the widows peak and slicked back, black hair and the high collar is very similar to how Mephisto appears in the German silent film Faust (1926), by F. W. Murnau (beginning with the scene where he gives Faust his youth). Is this anywhere cited as an influence on Dracula, or were these features already internationally common in depictions of evil characters by then? Postdlf 00:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Commentaries in the bonus section of the DVD release mention Dracula's appearance to have been changed by the playwrights, having in mind the typical vaudeville magician of the 1920s. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.180.109.163 (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Summary?

edit

Why is there no summary of the story? It differs slightly from the novel, so naturally I would assume there'd be a summary. --St jimmy86 17:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

At Walpurgis Night, after a harrowing ride through the Carpathian mountains in eastern Europe, Renfield enters castle Dracula to finalize the transferral of Carfax Abbey in London to Count Dracula, who is in actuality a vampire. Renfield is drugged by the eerily hypnotic count, and turned into one of his thralls, protecting him during his sea voyage to London. After sucking the blood and turning the young Lucy Weston into a vampire, Dracula turns his attention to her friend Mina Seward, daughter of Dr. Jack Seward who then calls in a specialist, Dr. Abraham Van Helsing, to diagnose the sudden deterioration of Mina's health. Van Helsing, realizing that Dracula is indeed a vampire, tries to prepare Mina's fiance, John Harker, and Dr. Seward for what is to come and the measures that will have to be taken to prevent Mina from becoming one of the undead.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.216.104.112 (talk) 01:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dracula's Transformations

edit

It is mentioned in the movie that Dracula changes into a wolf. In the scene after Van Helsing confronts him with the mirror, Dracula goes out of the room to the balcony. Jonathan Harker looks out and remarks about a big black dog bounding across the yard. WerewolfSatanist 18:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Two plot sections (summary vs detailed)

edit

Is it really advisable to have two plot sections, one summarized and one detailed? This seems rather needless! Isn't one enough? Dutzi (talk) 21:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Listen to them...

edit

...children of the night. What music they make. --62.216.118.84 (talk) 14:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

censorship

edit

van Sloan's adress to the audience is featured in the bonus material of the dvd release. It is of rather poor quality, maybe that is the reason for not being included in the restored movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.180.109.163 (talk) 12:25, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

opening music

edit

I was just listening to Tchaikovsky, and I believe it is the same music used in the title sequence of Dracula. I think the piece I was listening to was his Sleeping Beauty ballet. although, I'm not certain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Photoactivist (talkcontribs) 21:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Language

edit

I discovered a mistake in connection with the film. I have seen the film, and the willagers on the beginning of the film are speaking Hungarian, not romanian. Béla Lugosi was a hungarian-born actor, so he spoked hungarian and he worked with hungarians in many of his films ( like in the The Black Cat (1934 film)). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Illes.a88 (talkcontribs) 08:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Weird, skewed POV.

edit

"The film also employs extended periods of silence and character close-ups for dramatic effect, and employs several intertitles "

Since when is "two" considered "several"? "Aboard the Vesta" and "London." These comments are POV and skewed to make the thing sound like a movie made in 1920.

"Intertitles" are a card which contains only text, appearing between movie images, not superimposed location identification. The latter is hardly some sort of obsolete remnant from the silent era; it's still used today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ted Newsom (talkcontribs) 20:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced material

edit

Below information was tagged in 2013 for needing sources. Feel free to reinsert with appropriate references.

DonIago (talk) 12:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Dracula (1931 English-language film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).  Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 3 external links on Dracula (1931 English-language film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.  Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on Dracula (1931 English-language film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.  Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 10 March 2020

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. RM closed with nominator's agreement. (Non-admin closure). —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 01:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply



Dracula (1931 English-language film)Dracula (1931 film) – This article should be called Dracula (1931 film) or Dracula (film). The Dracula (1931 film) is an unnecessary disambiguation page created by Fortdj33 in 2014 to "To disambiguate from Spanish-language film". However, the Spanish language film is simply called Dracula (film) which makes this disambiguation page unnecessary and makes things more complicated while titles should be kept as simple as possible. Or, Dracula (1931 English-language film) could be simply moved to Dracula (film) since the article for the English-language film was created before and the English-language film is way more recognizable than the Spanish-language film, hence, people searching on Wikipedia search way more for the English-language film. SirEdimon (talk) 22:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Just to be clear the Spanish language film was renamed a couple times since 2007 and is now called Drácula (film) so removing the "English-language" dab from this article makes sense. MarnetteD|Talk 22:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Agree however in restoring the pre-October title of the Spanish film. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
AFI's Drácula write-up offers no explanation why the usually (but not always) reliable Catalog accents the film title which depicts the iconic name of the Transylvanian vampire count. Another such inexplicable accenting (over the "e") occurs in the Catalog's main title header for Greta Garbo's 1935 portrayal of the tragic Russian socialite Anna Karenina. Other film resources, such as AllMovie, TVGuide or Leonard Maltin's Classic Movie Guide do not accent the "a" in their write-ups of the Spanish version and, most importantly, the Spanish version does not accent "Dracula" in its on-screen credits. Wikipedia's main title header for the Spanish version should therefore be restored to Dracula (1931 Spanish-language film), thus obviating the need to move the main header for Dracula (1931 English-language film). —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 23:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Re-write

edit

Just a heads-up to people, i'm slowly working on an entire re-write of this article in my draft page [[User:Andrzejbanas/sandbox|here]. Although I'd rather people not edit it until its ready, I figured i'd give anyone a heads up if they are planning to do some major edits to the article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Colorized "stills".

edit

I have changed the image caption from "colorized stills" to "colorized lobby cards" (per the credit and description accompanying the images), lest anyone think they were from a "colorized" version of the film. (The images are cropped, but including that info in the caption would be too verbose.)

When I first saw these, I was aghast thinking that Wikipedia would stoop to including film stills from a "colorized" version; fortunately that was not the case. BMJ-pdx (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cast

edit

I tried to explain the characters in this movie and add facts about the characters they're playing, here they are, the facts from IMDB:

94.201.206.212 (talk) 15:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

You haven't provided sources for your info. DonIago (talk) 15:50, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
You have also included all manner of info not relevant to the film. Those items belong in the articles for the actors if it isn't already there. A simple cast list is best. MarnetteD|Talk 22:29, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Exactly, IMDB is unreliable. PrisonerB (talk) 13:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Faked lobby card

edit

Why use a digitally colored lobby card when the original file was black and white? Somebody felt artistic? 2A02:AA1:1646:F9C8:716C:C9FF:C998:1262 (talk) 01:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps black and white versions of them aren't available for display here? DonIago (talk) 18:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply