Talk:Doppelmayr/Garaventa Group

Reliable sources

This article needs some otherwise it's headed for AfD. – ukexpat (talk) 16:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I haven't found the reliable sources you seek to demonstrate notability. However, I do know that due to consolidation in the ropeway business there are only 2 major ropeway manufacturers left in the world and Doppelmayr is one of them. So, please proceed with caution This article needs improvement, not elimination. -- TRosenbaum (talk) 04:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doppelmayr Garaventa Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.london.gov.uk/media/press_releases_mayoral/mayor-announces-world-class-consortium-construct-london
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100610100913/http://www.ltwusa.com:80/? to http://www.LTWUSA.com
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060107100111/http://www.recreation.gr:80/uk_doppelmayer-history.htm to http://www.recreation.gr/uk_doppelmayer-history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Vista A La Linea Roja.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:06, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Nuevo Teleferico de Mérida Mukumbari 2015- 2.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:53, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Doppelmayr USA into Doppelmayr/Garaventa Group

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was not merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

---

WP:BRANCH. Once PR/promo trivia puff are removed, there's not enough contents at either page to justify their own and I think it's best to merge and redirect. Graywalls (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Oppose; the current structure seems to be working for readers. The Cable Transportation Engineering Company history fits well on the current page, but would be unbalanced on a merged page; the USA page has non-trivial references from multiple sources, which support independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 18:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed merge of Partek into Doppelmayr/Garaventa Group

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was not merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

---

Poorly sourced (a user-generated site) and does not appear to be independently notable. MB 18:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose. There is enough information on the site for Partek to be its own wikipedia article. The Partek brand of chairlift is still around today as a parts manufacturer, and thus is still (technically) in the industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tv.Rule (talk • contribs) 23:58, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

That is not a criterion we use for determining whether a subject has its own article. There needs to be in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. Currently, the article has one source which doesn't look reliable. Mentioning the company here is a alternative to deletion. If you can find more sources, go ahead and add them to the article and that change the outcome of this proposal. MB 01:47, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose. Partek was never bought by Doppelmayr/CTEC. They sold designs to Doppelmayr and entered into a 5-year non compete agreement on new installations using those designs. Partek has continued to relocate Borvig and Partek lifts, service them, and, since 2009, has been installing new lifts almost every year. I have updated the article to reflect this, with sources. Additionally, Partek is the current iteration of Borvig, one of the largest North American lift manufacturers who has installed hundreds of lifts. Partek is currently the 3rd largest lift manufacturer in North America, after Doppelmayr/Skytrac and Leitner-Poma Trolley8 (talk)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.