Talk:Diwali (The Office)
Diwali (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Diwali (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 25, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that "Diwali", a 2006 episode of The Office, was credited with helping introduce American audiences to Indian customs? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
trivia
editwhere are these "trivia" points supposed to be integrated into the article?...they aren't in summary of the episode or deleted scenes
I think the trivia are interesting. Relabel it if you want but please don't delete them. I'm removing the warning tag.GreekParadise (talk) 13:35, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it doesn't matter how "interesting" you think the pieces of trivia are, WP:TRIVIA says this quite clearly. Mastrchf (t/c) 14:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Theofficediwali.jpg
editImage:Theofficediwali.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kelly's sister's names
editAm I imagining it, or was one of the names she said something along hte lines of Nepa (pronounced like knee-pa)? I ask largely because if so, could it have been an intentional nod to North Eastern PA where Scranton is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.161.120 (talk) 03:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Diwali (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 04:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Issues
editGeneral
edit- No dab links. Great work!
- No dead links. Great work!
- The rationale for the image needs to be expanded
- I agree. I've removed it, as the rationale was insufficient and the resolution was too large.
Infobox
edit- Add "running time"
- Done
- "List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes" → List of The Office (U.S.) episodes"
- List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes is the correct link; List of The Office (U.S.) episodes is a red link
Lede
edit- Unlink television series per WP:OVERLINK
- Done
- Explain what a "rating" is. Nielsen ratings, etc.
- The lead is meant to be brief; I've added a link to Nielsen Media Research to help readers, but don't think anything else is needed here
Synopsis
edit- bicycle to work → bikes to work
- Done
- Unlink text message per WP:OVERLINK
- Done
Production
edit- Nothing is there
Reception
edit- Explain what a "rating" is. Nielsen ratings, etc.
- Similar to above. I've added a link to Nielsen Media Research and changed "ratings" to "ratings share". Otherwise, I think everything is sufficiently explained (4.2 percent of all 18-49 yr olds etc).
- Television Without Pity graded the episode with an A → Television Without Pity gave the episode wih an "A" grade
- Done
References
edit- Ref. 3, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16: All of them need publishers. If you don't know, click on the article for it
- I understand what you're saying, but this is not a requirement of the GA criteria. :) I prefer not to add this information (I think the work/publisher parameters are enough).
External links
edit- Link NBC.com in the section
- Done
Good work! TBrandley 04:06, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for the review! I really appreciate it. It was an interesting episode to write on :) Ruby 2010/2013 04:41, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Diwali (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120916143955/http://www.zap2it.com/zap-mindykalingtheofficediwali,0,580910.story to http://www.zap2it.com/zap-mindykalingtheofficediwali,0,580910.story
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130326052212/http://www.tvguide.com:80/celebrity-blogs/Episode-6-Diwali-19741.aspx to http://www.tvguide.com/celebrity-blogs/episode-6-diwali-19741.aspx
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/the-office/diwali.php?page=8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 31 December 2016 (UTC)