This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note
editSome material, I'm told, was taken from the 2006 Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) report, which states: "Use permitted with appropriate acknowledgment". I'm working from the good-faith belief that this restriction is compatible with our CC-BY-SA requirements. --j⚛e deckertalk 19:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Some material? Over thrity direct quotes from one source alone and many other direct copy/edit gives rise to blatant plagiarism. Rangasyd (talk) 12:38, 11 October 2014 (UTC)