Talk:Devon Ke Dev...Mahadev

Major work

I am going thru this article and making extensive copyedits and heading changes. If you have suggestions or ways to offer, please discuss here. --RichardMills65 (talk) 06:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

References

The references for this are all youtube videos; are there any better refs available ?--RichardMills65 (talk) 23:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Can we add youtube as a reference? What do you say?--Vyom25 (talk) 12:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Tables

I am considering making the references and the contents list into tables, as they are growing rather long. Thoughts? --RichardMills65 (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

also in the songs section, i can't figure out what picturised means.

Picturised, I think whoever wrote that, was trying to say something like, that song was based on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.232.195.92 (talk) 19:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

It would be nice, if you could add the episodes list in a separate page kind of a table or keep the summary of a week old episodes, and remove the summary for months old episode. Nihitmehta (talk) 17:58, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Devon ke Dev - Mahadev.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Devon ke Dev - Mahadev.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Devon ke Dev - Mahadev.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Plot Section...

Shiva is the most powerful God within the Hindu culture, says the page. This part of the sentence I am removing, because neither Shaktism nor Vaishnavism nor Smartism accepts this belief. The first paragraph of Wikipedia's page of either of these 3 can be referred to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.184.160.34 (talk) 11:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

songs section

songs are not important. who added songs? it is not important i m removing again and again but someone is reverting it do u agree with me that songs are not important? Forgot to put name (talk) 09:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Restoring references

Restoring all references in the article once again after User talk:106.212.211.139 removed them, with this edit, reverting. Last time in March, I had to revert again after User talk:116.203.60.78 removed all references with this edit. What's happening? Without references, the article will get deleted, no matter how popular it is on television. --Ekabhishek^talk 04:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Sonarika come back  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.111.223.43 (talk) 22:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 

Missing section that needs ammending

Following the great success of the series, Mahadev WILL be made into an ENGLISH MOVIE titled Shiva: The Man and the Many! With the technology and graphics and sets that have already been used in Mahadev, it has been seen as worthy enough of an English film! It has been described that the best portions of the series will be shot again in English for a 3 hour film focusing on simple philosophy that people who do not know of Mahadev or Hinduism could understand

82.11.184.125 (talk) 23:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

If you have any reliable and verifiable references to this info, please mention. --Ekabhishek^talk 07:13, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Also, please try not to sound like an obvious shill. -- TOW  07:45, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

there is too much of loud music in the serial...we would like to request you to lessen the sound of music so that the dialogues can be easily heard  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.220.123.98 (talk) 16:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC) 

Padmavati?

I'm trying to resolved the DAB link for Padmavati.

The article says that these actresses: Falaq Naaz / Ragini Rishi / Rubina Dilaik

palyed the parts of: Goddess Lakshmi / Haripriya / Vedavati / Sita / koRadha / Rukmini / Satyabhama / Padmavati[disambiguation needed]

However, IMDB only shows these actresses only played Lakshmi and Sita. Where is the information that says they played these other characters

As for Padmavati, I'm wondering if maybe this should be Padmavathi instead? Coastside (talk) 23:04, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Religious or Mythological?

An IP address user just changed the genre from mythological to religious. Was there a consensus on whether it should be either of those? What would be the correct term? BlacknoseDace (talk) 12:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

@BlacknoseDace: Hi there, I've seen this sort of thing in other TV articles related to Hinduism, where editors fervently wanted to change "mythological" to "historical" because as devotees of Hinduism, they consider it the unassailable history of their world, where objectively, the show uses characters from the Hindu mythology. There is some erroneous perception that "mythology" is pejorative, obviously because in common parlance we call falsehoods "myths". But we don't typically cater to ignorance. The editor who came by to change the wording here said Replaced an inappropriate word "mythological" with "religious". Well, "mythological" is not inappropriate--it's how most scholars would describe any legend. When I brought this matter up to the Noticeboard for India-related topics in April, some regulars felt it was normal to describe this sort of thing as mythological. Times of India considers it a mythological series. Even Hotstar, the company that made it, considers it a mythological series. So there is no justification to deviate from that. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing that up. I see the genre has been changed to mythological again, so I suppose this is resolved. BlacknoseDace (talk) 22:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)