Talk:Democratic mundialization
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Democratic mundialization redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Democratic mundialization page were merged into Democratic globalization on 17 October 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Move, Merge or Fix
editI propose that this page should be:
- Moved back to Democratic Globalization or...
- Merged with Mundialization if they are indeed the same thing and not the subtley different terms they appear to be or...
- Fixed so that the terms used on the page are consistant and clear.
It doesn't seem to be controverisal enough (juding by previous comments) to warrant going through a formal Wikipedia vote but I thought I should at least discuss it here unless there was a good reason for the move in the first place (the discussion below is a little cryptic about that). — Flooq (Talk) @ 05:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
"Democratic globalization" versus "Democratic mundialization"
editThis page is suffering from repeated blanking!! Help. --Dpr 19:05, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- See the notice on the page. // Pathoschild 19:23, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've moved Democratic globalization to Democratic mundialization. The talk page couldn't be moved because one already existed here. However, I see no point merging them, as the old talk page consists entirely of "hoy". // Pathoschild 22:20, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- "Mundialization" gets 952 google hits and "Mundialisation" 154. There're not found in any dictionary. Therefore it would be considered a neologism. Please see Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms and Wikipedia:Google test.
-- Miborovsky U|T|C|E| 22:49, 2 October 2005- *shrug* I merely moved it at the request of an anonymous contributor with a solid edit history; if s/he wishes, s/he'll argue his case here. On an unrelated note, your comment timestamp updates into perpetuity. // Pathoschild 22:53, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- "Mundialization" gets 952 google hits and "Mundialisation" 154. There're not found in any dictionary. Therefore it would be considered a neologism. Please see Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms and Wikipedia:Google test.
- I've moved Democratic globalization to Democratic mundialization. The talk page couldn't be moved because one already existed here. However, I see no point merging them, as the old talk page consists entirely of "hoy". // Pathoschild 22:20, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
Mundialization is a theory that seems to differ somewhat from democratic globalization, the two article should be separate. I don't know why somebody renamed democratic globalization into democratic mundialization, while there is already a mundialization article. --Pgreenfinch 09:52, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- I guess we should have seperate articles for them.
-- Миборовский U|T|C|E 18:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Notability?
editIs this term something spear beyond Yahoo group and one website? Did it appear in some serious newspaper, for example? This information is missing from the article. Pavel Vozenilek 08:06, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
- I think the notability of global democracy speaks for itself. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Democratic globalization
editTwo articles on same topic. A merged article would be even stronger, I think. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 18:58, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I agree, and democratic globalization is the most common naming. --Pgreenfinch (talk) 12:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)--Pgreenfinch (talk) 12:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Done