This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
davidu (talk·contribs) / Ulevitch, David This user has contributed to the article.
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I'm sure David is a nice guy, but this article needs to be toned down and edited for relevance. It reads more like an advertisement for David IMHO Brianmcgee1721:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
I agree, actually. Can I submit some proposed changes here?
Absolutely. Another thing to think about is helping increase the amount of source material available - if there are specific facts that you might want included, but that aren't necessarily available somewhere, you could post them, say, on your personal website, and that way they could be included in the article with an appropriate citation, without their being original research. —Krellis03:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I just noticed that virtually the entire page was cribbed from David's bio on OpenDNS.com, so I removed all of the material that wasn't properly re-written, and added that page to the References. The article needs a lot of love, and as much as David's a cool guy, I'm starting to question notability. Anyone have thoughts? —Krellis05:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I thought it was borderline too, but he's been featured in several interviews, and openDNS is a somewhat widely recognized contribution. I don't want the final word here, but I think he meets the notability guidelines. Brianmcgee1700:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
