Talk:David Lidington

Europe minister

"Previously he was Minister of State for Europe and hence the longest-serving Europe Minister in British history.[1]" I do not understand how this makes him the longest serving, should this be 'last'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxdown (talk • contribs) 22:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
* agree as per Foxdown Clarissa1925 (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on David Lidington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100515034600/http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/topstorynews/2010/05/her-majestys-government-49840 to http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/topstorynews/2010/05/her-majestys-government-49840
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5364110/MPs-expenses-David-Lidington-is-Mr-Clean-but-you-pay-for-his-soap.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/mps_expenses_the_price_of_democracy_in_aylesbury_vale_1_613622
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/more-news/editor-s-comment-time-fast-approaching-for-mr-lidington-to-stand-up-and-be-counted-over-hs2-1-5655994

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Siblings

It seems odd to me that this article refers to one of his brothers (Peter, a teacher), but not to his other brother.

I was at school with the Lidington boys - we travelled to school together. David, the oldest, was a year or two ahead of me; Peter was in my year; and Tony a year or two below Peter and me. Tony went on to a life in the theatre. peter_english (talk) 13:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

I guess this is he. A definite family resemblance. Cheers!
Gareth Griffith-Jones, The Welsh Buzzard (Talk) 14:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

I think it refers to Peter because a history teacher?
Equinoxmist (talk) 23:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Lidington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120908181804/http://www.debretts.com/people/biographies/browse/l/17051/David+LIDINGTON.aspx to http://www.debretts.com/people/biographies/browse/l/17051/David+LIDINGTON.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110911095051/http://www.buckstv.co.uk/buckstv/politics/day_in_the_life_with_an_mp_in_westminster.html to http://www.buckstv.co.uk/buckstv/politics/day_in_the_life_with_an_mp_in_westminster.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

De facto deputy prime minister

Socks, socks, and more socks. --NeilN talk to me 15:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Lidington is de facto deputy prime minister according to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/01/19/britain-could-one-day-join-reformed-eu-hints-theresa-mays-de/ and other sources I added this to page but it seems that user @Emir of Wikipedia: keeps reverting it, possibly due to conflict of interest or because vandalism and removing clearly referenced material is a habit of this user, as also reported at [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarissa1925 (talk • contribs) If there is other sources then please show them. As per WP:BRD if a bold edit is reverted by me or anyone else then you should take to the talkpage and discuss it. What conflict of interest could I have? Please don't use the term vandalism here unless you have read WP:Vandalism and know the specific meaning it has here. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC) @Emir of Wikipedia: other sources you can find here: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=de+facto+deputy+prime+minister+david+lidington&oq=de+facto+deputy+prime+minister+david+lidington&aqs=chrome..69i57.7086j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Telegraph article referenced in article is more than enough anyway though. And does this user know what de facto means? Clarissa1925 (talk) Please revert back to the Wikipedia:Consensus version of the article, and then we can discuss your edits. It is not my job to look through Google for other sources, if you add a claim the burden is on you to add sources. One source by the Telegraph is not more than enough anyway. I do know what de facto means, but do you. Also a ping doesn't work unless you sign your comment in the same edit. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC) @GregPantry: Please discuss here, "admin approval" is not needed. In the meantime please revert to the consensus version. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC) I don't know why this appears to be such a contreversial edit. Enough references to support it, including: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/01/19/britain-could-one-day-join-reformed-eu-hints-theresa-mays-de/ https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/lidington-calls-for-tories-to-show-more-respect-to-theresa-may-b8g7dqfkm http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/david-lidington-eu-brexit_uk_5a62f55ae4b0dc592a08f40b https://www.politico.eu/article/radical-changes-ahead-for-eu-says-theresa-mays-deputy-david-lidington/ https://www.politico.eu/article/cabinet-reshuffle-brandon-lewis-uk-immigration-minister-moved-to-chair-tory-party/ http://www.cityam.com/278379/cabinet-reshuffle-theresa-may-reveals-first-major-shake-up https://www.ft.com/content/a92aa982-0fe8-11e8-8cb6-b9ccc4c4dbbb I agree with emir that Clarissa1925 (talk) was rather lazy for not providing it, but they are now provided so that should suffice. I can give you more, but I think 7 is more than enough and certainly ample! They are all credible sources (read Wikipedia:Academic use if you don't understand why), and if you dispute one source, there's 6 others. I don't know much about the UK Parliament, but as an independent, just a quick bit of research has shown me that consensus definitely for keeping this change. Clearly referenced in the article and not controversial. It should remain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GregPantry (talk • contribs)