Talk:Dave Ulliott

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Mid-importance).

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Dave Ulliott is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devilfish

I added a line about another meaning of the term devilfish. I don't think it needs a seperate page. Masa 08:08, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

5k to 83k in two hands? say WHAT?

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

On one day he bought into a table for $5,000 and in the space of two hands worked it up to $83,000.

This claim is absurdly ridiculous, and I have removed it. Though I suppose it is mathematically possible, it is highly improbable. Plus there is no source cited. Out it goes, unless someone can provide some proof of it and an explanation as well. SmartGuy 21:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rockerfella Vintage

h. Stewart Reuben, in his book _Poker Twenty-four Seven_ says that Ulliot was generally not a winner in London cash-games when they both played PLO and London Lowball there. Of course, this doesn't mean he could not have made a big score like this.65.79.173.135 (talk) 16:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Will in New Haven65.79.173.135 (talk) 16:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The highly dubious allegations in the "Early Life & Criminal Activities" (giving the police hand relief, being a member of the Crash Test Dummies, being sodomised in a police cell and losing a limb in a fight - don't know which is more embarassing) would suggest that some libelous vandalism has taken place. Perhaps someone who knows more about the subject than me should make some corrections pronto... Martan 21:16, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Short Film

It says hes gonna appear in a short film in 2006.... has he?

Date of birth

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sources disagree over Ulliott's date of birth, both the date/month and the year:

This source says "April 1"
these three sources [1], [2], [3] say "January 4 1954"
apparently Swimming with the Devilfish (Wilson, Des (2006), Macmillan, ISBN 1-4050-8952-0) lists his year of birth as 1962 (I don't have access to this source so I can't confirm that)

I think the "April 1"/"January 4" discrepancy is probably the old American vs British date format thing. DH85868993 14:57, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Swimmingwiththedevilfish.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Swimmingwiththedevilfish.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Daveulliott4.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Daveulliott4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ernie Els comparison from inside poker

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Calling something "a bit stupid" falls under original research as it your opinion which isn't encyclopedic, there are many actions that we might view to be stupid personally however our opinions should not and must not be included , be it a Poker Player, an actor or a President. as far as the article,if you read the source it states that this was something said by a golfing partner named Williamson comparing his skills as a poker player to that of a pro golfer not his nationality, people of different nations race or sex may be compared in their field a written article to someone else in a different field without respect to nation but that their skills. ▪◦▪≡SiREX≡^Talk 23:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Page Reads Like a Brag

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Most of his "exploits" are quoted from his biography which is anything by scientific or credible. Also lots of details about his poker career are of little relevance and, for professional poker players, not actually very notable. They all sound like "wow he's so good he made X money" or "wow he's so good he knew how to fold a good hand when he's beat" and so on. --86.17.70.26 (talk) 15:38, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

For instance: "In the UK, Ulliott is such a household name that he has been name-dropped in EastEnders, and in the inaugural edition of PokerPlayer magazine, Ulliott was not only on the front cover, but also voted #9 on their (worldwide) Top 10 Poker Legends List.[33][34]"

Oh the irony. --86.17.70.26 (talk) 15:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Number of children.

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article says he had seven children, but his obituary in The Times says eight, including one by his third wife whom he married in 2011. - Arwel Parry (talk) 08:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dave Ulliott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Dave Ulliott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dave Ulliott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic