Talk:Daughters of the American Revolution

Note to the editors

Note to the editor: The Daughters of the American Revolution extends membership with discrimination today as it did in the past. The group denies membership to those who have been adopted into qualifying families, even in the case when the child is legally said to be born to said qualifying family. In other words, children raised in the system of an old fashioned, closed adoption are barred and denied not only membership, but also the benefits of said membership, despite the fact that in the eyes of the law of the United States of America said individuals are legally recognized as the blood offspring of qualifying families.

Although certainly a rare circumstance, it goes against what the Wikipedia I love so much has published. As an avid user, I believe it to be wrong for you to publish that the D.A.R. extends membership to all of those female descendants of veterans of the American Revolution.

In my case for example, my birth certificate states that I was born to the son of a D.A.R. member. This is a legal birth certificate issued in the state of IL in the USA. It is my only birth certificate. However, as I was adopted by the son of the D.A.R. member at birth, I am not allowed the benefits of membership realized by many of my female relatives.

This is important because the organization, in receipt of federal funding as well as the promotion of American values, acts against the very legal jurisprudence that this country deems vital to American society, that is the protection of the family unit, in this case in the form of the closed system of adoption. In a closed adoption, the value of the blood line is second to the needs of the state. That is, that the family unit, as a building block of society, is more important than the D.A.R.'s geneaological snobbery.

This is the law. Therfore, it is against the legal policy of the United States of America for the D.A.R. to discriminate against me. You see I am not an illegitimate member of a family of descendants of American Revolutionary War veterans--I am legitimate in said family. I deserve to be recognized in this way and it is illegal to do anything but.

This information is not very important. However, it does indeed point out that it is factually incorrect to state that D.A.R. offers membership in these ways. This practice continues the historical pejorative spririt of the D.A.R. More importantly, it bastardizes children already disadvantaged, and this is wrong.

I ask the Wikipedia to edit the D.A.R. entry and reflect their continued practice of discrimination.

Thank you for your consideration,

Colleen M. Boyle c-boyle3@northwestern.edu

Is there a source for this information? Does it appear on their website? Thanks, -Willmcw 06:27, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

My grandma was refused admission because she couldn't provide enough proof.

-- Al™ 07:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

As noted in the main article, NSDAR genealogists evaluate proofs submitted with applications based on accepted genealogical standards. The genealogists also make an effort to find an alternative ancestor for applicants who can't find acceptable proofs for the application they submitted. That may not have been the case when your grandmother applied. I'm a DAR member and I have personally helped applicants successfully find alternative ancestors. Unfortuantely, a lot of ancestors didn't leave the records we would like for them to have left behind.

• As a SAR member, I'd like to point out that the SAR has the same restrictions. Both organizations are based on blood lines. Even illigitimate "bastard" children can become members, as long as they can prove the blood line. Adoptions which are out of the bloodline are letitimately excluded. It should also be pointed out that these are private organizations. To join the SAR, an existing member must vouch for the applicants "good character", and the applicant must also state that he believes in a Creator. I understand Ms. Boyle's frustration, but maybe she will feel a little better to know that the "benefits" of membership, as far as I can tell, are more about bragging rights than anything of substantial value. Perhaps it is different with the DAR, as they seem to be more well known, and have more policital "clout". Crockspot 15:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Eligibility criteria for DAR membership and information on how to join is on the DAR web site which is linked in the main article. Adopted children are welcome to become members, but they must join through a line from one of their biological parents. An applicant has to prove descent for each generation, starting with the applicant and going back to the patriot generation, just as one does for other lineage societies.. VolunteerMom 01:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

From a 48 year DAR:

These responses are enlightening. apparently there have been some modifications since I joined in 1975 and was very active for a number of years thereafter. In later years I have not followed developments as closely on the subject of adoptions. I found the original post a bit unclear, but I have a suggestion prompted by some subsequent clarifications here. I don't know if this might be a first, but if you are the actual biological daughter who was subsequently legally adopted by that same father, you might have a DNA test to prove that. Don't know if that has ever been done or if it would help. It might bolster your claim.

But I caution this one thing. If I read correctly, your father was an SAR. If that is the case and he did not go into SAR through his MOTHER or her line proven by DAR, you have a bit of a problem using his SAR papers. The SAR permits DAR papers as proofs, but the DAR does not accept SAR papers without other proofs. The problem is that the DAR keeps better records than the SAR and is always updating them. You can use the SAR papers to start looking for original records of their claims, and you may find some of those proofs in DAR records or you may have to ferret out originals. If your father used his father's SAR papers, good luck. You will have to prove every single item. 184.19.31.157 (talk) 05:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

@184.19.31.157 Oops. 48 year DAR again here.

You say your adoptive father was the son of a DAR. You will have to re-prove claims in grandmother's papers. DAR no longer uses "shortform". BUT again, your adoptive father must also be your biological father. Genealogical Socities are strictly by blood, as Crockpot pointed out. 184.19.31.157 (talk) 06:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Rosmary e castetter

Daughter of American revolution 2600:1702:D70:3990:88A3:1F7:3159:FBD6 (talk) 15:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

How do I register?

I am a daughter of the first Revolution. 2600:4040:3041:F100:7137:8732:538E:164D (talk) 22:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

This is not a question for Wikipedia. I would suggest taking a look at their website. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)