This article was nominated for deletion on 31 January 2022. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
sources from the AFD
editThe book review notes: "I had a few other quibbles like that. But the reason I had quibbles is that Rudder’s book offers you something to quibble with. Most data-hyping books are vapor and slogans. This one has the real stuff: actual data and actual analysis taking place on the page."
The book review notes: "“Dataclysm” may make an excellent case for the necessity of user data in social-science research, but it does little to justify experimentation on users. Interestingly, many questions addressed in the book didn’t require such experimentation to answer. The answers were already in the data; for better or worse, it was just a matter of looking."
The book review notes: "Rudder is sensitive to these pitfalls, even though he could have easily become another tech evangelist. His book delivers both insider access and a savvy critique of the very machinery he is employed by. Since he's been in the data mines and has risen above them, Rudder becomes a singular and trustworthy guide."
The book review notes: "The mammoth scope of Rudder’s work is impressive. It is most interesting to place yourself in the conclusions that the numbers show you. It is also at times a little frightening."
The book review notes, "It’s only fair to note that Dataclysm requires an attentive reader who has a commitment to the subject matter. The payoff is worth the effort."
The book review notes: "Given the amount of information being gathered about us, we need something that takes the ethical questions of 2014 more seriously, or at least helps us better understand the industries from which these numbers come — not a book filled with data about data collection heaped upon an existing mountain of data, all of it telling us what we sort of already knew."
This is a 136-word book review. The book review notes: "Christian Rudder's Dataclysm: Who We Are (When We Think No One's Looking) is a smart and funny meander through information that the OkCupid cofounder has collected from his dating site, as well as from Twitter, Facebook, Craigslist, and other places where people express their innermost thoughts and desires."
This is a 216-word book review. The book review notes: "Rudder, cofounder of dating site OKCupid, offers an irreverent, thought-provoking popularization of data science, specifically online user data and what it tells us about attraction, division, and identity."
This is a 328-word book review. The book review notes: "Demographers, entrepreneurs, students of history and sociology, and ordinary citizens alike will find plenty of provocations and, yes, much data in Rudder's well-argued, revealing pages."
This is a 228-word book review. The book review notes: "Rudder (cofounder and president, OKCupid.com) here presents an extensive analysis of the online personal data collected by his site".
This a four-sentence book review. The book review notes: "OkCupid co-founder Rudder drills down into that last category via charts, graphs and intriguing analyses of human behavior gleaned from the wealth of social data now available." Metro2fsb (talk) 20:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC)