Talk:Data management plan
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Problematic claims
editThe article is slanted in a very DMP positive direction, making unsupported claims about the efficacy of DMPs. I would welcome a discussion about how to improve the article so it reflects current research on the subject while still acknowledging the various DMP requirements and mandates from funders and universities. More references to published research would be great! (I have modified some of the most brazen claims about DMP benefits.) --Glitterspont (talk) 07:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Request for edits
editI work for the Digital Curation Centre and in particular I'm a developer on the DMPonline tool for creating DMPs. I think it would be useful to add a section on DMP tools (DMPonline and the already-referenced DMPTool), though it would be a conflict of interest for me to add that myself. --Paddy (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Source for idealized DMP
edit- Miksa, Tomasz; Simms, Stephanie; Mietchen, Daniel; Jones, Sarah (February 13, 2018). "Ten simple rules for machine-actionable data management plans (preprint)". doi:10.5281/zenodo.1172673.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help)
Generalisation and internationalisation
editThough a common issue across WP, it's best if US items are used as examples, rather than the entirety of the article. Could be useful to draw more heavily from the international Research Data Alliance. Topics covered include: