Talk:Dann Huff

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Walter Görlitz in topic VIAF

VIAF

edit

My correction of the VIAF has been reverted wirh the comment "The other was a different Dann Huff. The French source is wrong." But I dont believe that this, this and this entries (belonging to VIAF 24794956) are incorrect. -- Jesi (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

The correct was wrong. Because http://viaf.org/viaf/232935576/ is the subject mentioned here while http://viaf.org/viaf/24794956/ isn't. Feel free to fix VIAF. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, you are right, my comment "correction" was not correct, it should be "changing the VIAF". But your comment "The French source is wrong" was also not correct; so far I have no answer to my questions, if the VIAF-entries given above are right (I think, they are). Now we have to curious situation, that the VIAF-link in the article VIAF 232935576 leads to en entry with only the Czech library, while more important libraries as the US-library of Congress, the French Library and the German National Library (including 40 publications of the person) – given by VIAF 24794956 – are not available from the article. Normally in the article should be the "better" link. But obviously we are two different kinds of authors. So what. -- Jesi (talk) 13:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Since I don't understand your question I am unable to answer it. In short, fix VIAF, do not break the English Wikipedia. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply