Talk:Danish Superliga

History

As a non-Dane if you will I believe I have a neutral standpoint, with no knowledge of the league I reccomend that some history be added to the article. For example the article for the Premiership includes how the premiership came about, perhaps this is needed here. Additionally the article quotes that teams play each other thrice, once home and away and another location depending on the previous seasons points. Here some ratification of which points result in which outcome - this area confused me so a thorough description of third round games needs adding --W022a 15:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I have copied a part of the history section of the Danish football champions article, describing the general history of the Superliga.

About the "third round" thing, I'm not sure what the rules are. With eleven matches each "round", it follows that either 5 or 6 of those are on home ground. The top half of the league each year, are awarded this 6th home game, creating a small advantage, both in support and economically. Another thing with the "third round" is, that the teams you play against in this "third round" are pretty random. This means that luck in the fixtures could be deciding, as FC Copenhagen play Brøndby IF twice at Parken and once on Brøndby Stadium. In the other end of the table, newly promoted Vejle BK play one home game and two away games against fellow promotees Randers FC, even though Vejle won the Danish 1st Division ahead of Randers last year. But I don't know any real details I would be confident in putting up as explanations. Poulsen 22:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

It is the "first round" there is (more or less) random. If team 1 plays home against team 2 in "second round", team 2 plays home against team 1 in "third round". It is a software, made by DBU, there map out the match schedule [1]. kalaha 10:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Faxe Kondi Ligaen.png

Image:Faxe Kondi Ligaen.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Notable foreign players

What makes a player a "notable player"? Personally, I don't see Adrian Cann as being notable (therefore, removed), but there are other players who aren't noted --85.82.249.149 (talk) 22:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Danish Superliga fan

- I totally agree. I created the category, but I find it hard to establish criterias. I would argue that a "notable player" should at least had proven himself capable of succeeding at a higher level than that of the danish superliga or at his national team. I have deleted nathan coe, Michaël Murcy, Sasho Petrovski, Elrio van Heerden and Stefan Gislason and you could probably delete some of the swedes and norwegians, that I doubt will be notable to anyone outside scandinavia. However people may always want to add someone from their favourite club. /Tobias —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.242.64.2 (talk) 23:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

I think caps, especially for higher ranked national teams, is another good criterion. Since many of the Swedes and all of the Norwegians currently listed have been capped many times, almost all of them should probably be kept. Maybe Tobias Grahn could be spared, but I can't really find anyone else that shouldn't be on the list. Sakkura (talk) 01:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Esbjerg & Randers

Is there a reason for Esbjerg & Randers having "n/a" as their first season? Esbjerg won a championship in 1961 and a graph on their article shows the team was even earlier in the top flight. And Randers FC article has a table which says they made a one-year visit to Superliga in 2004-2005. 85.217.20.178 (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Danish Superliga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100220155517/http://www.business.dk:80/medier-reklamer/superliga-bold-paa-skaermen-i-dubai-og-graekenland to http://www.business.dk/medier-reklamer/superliga-bold-paa-skaermen-i-dubai-og-graekenland

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)