This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Being the leader of a major pro-conservative actavistgroup, and an active personality for several acclaimed political columns are enough to (barely) meet WP:N. Most of the biased adjectives have already been weeded out; and the only things missing for this to be an acceptable BLP are non-primary sources. It's safe to say that the acclaimed newspapers would be reliable enough. I will cite those shortly. Until then, I'm contesting the deletion proposal.GuyHimGuy (talk) 05:57, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
