This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion
Why has Dani still not got an article? She MORE than meets notability guidelines. She won a major reality series, has a book, started in a mini reality series, has had several theatre roles, and meets WP:ENT. Are there any objections to the recreation of her page? – DarkGlow (talk) 20:38, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Has her new reality show actually been broadcast? A brief look showed lots of speculation by nothing definite. If it not broadcast then WP:CRYSTAL applies. If it has been broadcast I would say its big enough to recreate. --Salix alba (talk): 21:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
A reference to Dani Dyer in the Guardian caused me to wonder who she was - Wikipedia should provide the answer. Ain't that what we're here for? Perhaps @Onel5969: will explain why the stub article was reverted? — Saltmarshtalk20:03, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yup, the agenda is called WP's notability guidelines. Of which she doesn't meet. This was the subject of an AfD discussion last year, post her Love Island appearance, and since then she has done nothing to help her meet WP:NACTOR. Hence the consensus of the AfD should stand.Onel5969TT me21:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
