Talk:Dancing's Done

Latest comment: 9 months ago by AskeeaeWiki in topic GA Review

Requested move 26 December 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 15:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


Dancing's Done (song)Dancing's Done – The article without the "(song)" was created for the same thing. Jvaspad (talk) 14:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Dancing's Done/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AskeeaeWiki (talk · contribs) 01:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be happy to review this article. I hope you can be patient with me, as it is my first time reviewing a GA nominee article. Thank you. AskeeaeWiki (talk) 01:26 February 12, 2024 (UTC)

Review

edit

Read through the article, and here is what I can say:

  • First criteria – understandable to a broad audience, follows WP:WTW and WP:MOSLAYOUT, but I recommend lead could be seperated into two paragraphs, preferably split after the mention of its release date, or split before mention of critical reception. If changed, the article passes this criteria.
  • Second criteria – Article generally follows a summary style, and does not stray into unneeded trivial information. Mentioning who wrote/produced the song in the article again in the Background and composition section is unneeded, so I would remove it. All information is reliably cited, does not violate WP:OR, and does not include any copyright violations or plagiarism. Overall, article passes the criteria if the mentioned problem is dealt with.
  • Third criteria – Pass, overall addresses the main aspects of the topic, and doesn't stray away from a summary style.
  • Fifth criteria – Pass, article is stable, only fixes are performed to the article.
  • Sixth criteria – Pass, doesn't have any illustration, media, or audio, but is not a requirement. However, if such information can be provided, I would recommend.
  • Additional information: I would recommend removing the false title present in the article, by adding "the" before "American singer Ava Max". However, as it is a personal essay, it is fine to keep.

Overall, if the two problems mentioned in the first and second criteria are fixed, the article passes nomination. Respond when you can. Cheers! User:AskeeaeWiki (talk) 10:26 February 12, 2024 (PST)

Problems with the article have been fixed, as they are easily resolvable. Article passes nomination. User:AskeeaeWiki (talk) 10:26 February 12, 2024 (PST)