Talk:Daimler-Benz DB 601

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merging articles

edit

I am wondering about if the DB 600, DB 601 and DB 605 articles should be merged. All of these articles are under-developed, and they describe the same line of engines, that directly descended from each other, with their designation being changed. It would be much easier to describe them in the same article, instead of repeating the same facts in all three article, how they were developed from the F4 prototypes. A new article could be called DB DB 600, 601, 605 or 'DB 600 series' Note though that the DB 603 was a different line of development and should probably merit its own article.

Thoughts? Kurfürst (talk) 17:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daimler-Benz DB 601. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:29, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply