Talk:Daala

Proseline in History

An edit intended to make Daala#History look less like proseline was reverted: "the history of codec is easier to overview in older version". Perhaps I'm not understanding the logic behind that essay. --Damian Yerrick (talk) 18:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

It was just a detailed list of blog posts on the Xiph.Org website anyway. Maybe it's nice to have those linked somewhere for further reading, but I don't think that the posting of a blog entry is a relevant step in the history of the format. I replaced it with a summary.--Flugaal (talk) 12:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Lossless mode?

Will there be a lossless mode available? Bumblebritches57 (talk) 04:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

I just installed the Daala source code and according to the encoder_example help text, it does support a lossless mode. Proof: http://i.imgur.com/N67UGuh.png Bumblebritches57 (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

"Will there be" somehow asks for a look into the crystal ball. The format is far from being finalized.--Flugaal (talk) 12:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

submission of Daala to IETF

Further information: User talk:GrandDrake § submission of Daala to IETF

“On March 25, 2015, Daala was proposed to the IETF for their Internet Video Codec (NETVC) video standard.”

In fact, Daala is not proposed as a whole, only individual coding techniques are. There is a comprehensive list of all official submissions that clearly shows that. Additionally,

• none of the given references mentions the 25th of March,
• in March there was merely a presentation on Daala given to the working group,
• official submissions of Daala-related documents took place in June and July,
• IETF does not “rubberstamp” (as they say) any one submitted format proposal, but instead freely develop something different out of the input they get.

I edited that sentence accordingly once again.--Flugaal (talk) 12:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Daala was presented as a candidate at IETF 92 and there are now two references in support of that. --GrandDrake (talk) 03:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

I fail to see how those references support that.--Flugaal (talk) 07:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

The Daala presentation at IETF 92 would be one reference and the tom's hardware article that covers it would be the second reference. Also I have added a statement that refers to testing of tools from both Daala and Thor. --GrandDrake (talk) 02:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304123116/http://thanglong.ece.jhu.edu/Tran/Pub/prepost.pdf to http://thanglong.ece.jhu.edu/Tran/Pub/prepost.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304123116/http://thanglong.ece.jhu.edu/Tran/Pub/prepost.pdf to http://thanglong.ece.jhu.edu/Tran/Pub/prepost.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 3 September 2017 (UTC)