Talk:DIII-D (tokamak)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | On 30 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to DIII-D. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
DIII and D
editWas it an upgrade to DIII ? Is the 2nd D for Divertor ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Coordinates
editI believe the given coordinates are incorrect. I think the fusion reactor is here: 32.902251, -117.228856. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 03:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Untitled
editDIII-D is not a fusion reactor.
It is a tokamak used to investigate how to best build a fusion reactor.
The page should be moved to DIII-D (tokamak). — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmiliaWiki (talk • contribs) 13:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Done. I agree with this and I've performed the move. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 00:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you EmiliaWiki (talk) 09:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 30 March 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 03:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
DIII-D (tokamak) → DIII-D – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. GZWDer (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Google and views[[1]] doesn't suggest this is the primary topic so the base name should be retargeted to DIII. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)