Talk:Cymphonique Miller

Age

People keep sticking her age and birth dates in the article, even though they have yet to provide a reliable source. This will get reverted every time, until a reliable source is provided. It's more than amusing that nobody can even agree on the date. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 19:43, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

• It has been confirmed that her birthdate is August 1, 1996. Please stop reverting it, thank you.LAUGH90 (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Twitter and her personal website are not reliable sources. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 00:40, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Actually official/personal websites can be perfectly acceptable self-published sources regarding information on the subject themselves. We quite often ask BLP subjects to confirm basic biographical data via their website when contacted via OTRS - this is also suggested at BLPN when subjects post there. I agree that a tweet from an outside source is poor, it is not from the subject and does not meet WP:RS. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 01:00, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

So I can create a website about myself and say that I'm engaged to Meryl Streep, and that would be an acceptable source? The Mark of the Beast (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, you would lose credibility in pretty short order, assuming you were notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia. I did not create the current policies and guidelines regarding reliable sources and self-published sources, I was simply outlining what the current consensus is (and note the caveat of "not unduly self-serving"). If there are no independent sources stating an exact date of birth, yet the subject's own website states, for example, February 12th, are you asserting that this does not meet the requirements of verifiability? If so, then a discussion needs to happen at Wikipedia talk:RS in order to update the guidelines there. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 01:06, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

It always serves an actress/entertainer's best interests to appear younger than she really is. Remember the actress who's suing imdb because they put up her real age. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Cymphonique-miller.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Cymphonique-miller.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Cymphonique-miller.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cymphonique Miller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120622235350/http://www.wnba.com/sparks/promotional_calendar.html to http://www.wnba.com/sparks/promotional_calendar.html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)