This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
While I like Cryptozoic, this page reads more like an advertisement than a Wiki article. Maybe someone with more experience than me could compare it against the neutrality guidelines?
Agreed, especially the part about "the industry's premier developer". To be called that after only being in existence for 2 years and only having one major product line is a bit ridiculous. Finally31 (talk) 18:18, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
This article is ridiculous, their products are not widely praised and they are far from a premier developer in the board game and card game field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9B0:1:1015:44FE:23D2:EE2F:41FB (talk) 15:31, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- The promotional aspect of this article has now been returned to a more neutral tone. Shearonink (talk) 15:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)