This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NPOV
editEdited the article to remove the date of the formation of Sheffield United because of NPOV issues. There's no reason to include this date but not the date of the formation of other local teams. No date should be included as such information isn't appropriate for this article and is included in the Adelphi hotel article and the articles of each individual team. Kristmace (talk) 21:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Also, moved paragraphs so that snooker is mentioned in the opening paragraph and the football reference is further down. Snooker championships is what the theatre is mainly known for nationally and internationally, and therefore should be in the opening paragraph. Kristmace (talk) 21:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Agree. To me, a foreigner, the building is simply the one in which the professional snooker's most prestigious tournament, the annual World Snooker Championship takes place. I'm not interested in what happens through the rest of the year. Others might be. Let's leave it as it is.Moitraanak (talk) 11:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Samuel West
editSamuel West was artistic director from 2005 until last year [1]. I would put a reference in, but it would seem a bit odd putting a reference in for a fact that is no longer in the article at all. --VinceBowdren (talk) 23:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Vince, No problem with revert if is a fact (was just no reason given for removal in edit summary). But would it not be better to leave him in the article with a reference to departure, as Artistic director from xx to yy, as it is an important position. It like removing reference to the past team mangers at a football club. Or a bit like rewriting history by omision of fact. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 23:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Snooker Statistics
editShouldn't the number of frames played at the crucible statistics go on the World Snooker Championship page? Probably in the table of other statistics. They look totally out of place here. --Rjmunro (talk) 11:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Angela McMahon, Designer
editI've reverted the edits made by User:ANGELACMCMAHON to the infobox; there is nothing in the article to support these. In fact, I've failed to find any support anywhere for them or for the remarkable assertions made in the user's edit summary for them. I've asked politely on the user's talk page for further information. I also looked for information on Angela McMahon; the profile at http://www.viadeo.com/en/profile/angela.mcmahon2 is also remarkable. --Mabzilla (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Pictures from the inside
editAren't there any pictures from the inside available? --Kajdron (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Crucible Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060705004218/http://www.sheffieldtheatres.co.uk/index.cfm?fuseaction=content.view&CategoryID=10&ContentID=2 to http://www.sheffieldtheatres.co.uk/index.cfm?fuseaction=content.view&CategoryID=10&ContentID=2
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081009004204/http://www.shapingsheffield.com/html/aboutarea.html to http://www.shapingsheffield.com/html/aboutarea.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)