Talk:Criminal orders (Nazi Germany)

Military history: European / German / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 4 August 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page not moved. There was no consensus for the move. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Dane ^talk 17:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Criminal orders → Criminal orders (Nazi Germany) – See below (t · c) buidhe 07:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Judging from search results, the primary topic for this term is protection orders (redirect -> injunction), aka criminal protection orders or criminal orders for short.[1][2][3] "Criminal order" is also an alternative term for unlawful order in the generic sense, in terms of war crimes.[4][5] However, judging from Google Scholar results, this meaning is much less prominent than the first. Therefore, I suggest a primary redirect to injunction, with hatnotes as appropriate. (t · c) buidhe 07:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Oppose redirect to injunction, which does not mention the term. Protection orders and protection order point to two different articles... Srnec (talk) 20:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
I do not object to a move per se, but a dab page seems more useful right now than the proposed redirect. Srnec (talk) 22:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Oppose: there's no other article with this name at the moment, so a disambig in the article name is not needed. If such articles develop, then creating a disambig page would make more sense than a straight move. I don't see a need for this just yet. --K.e.coffman (talk) 13:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic