This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Should there be a separate article called Cheyenne military societies? Looking at Council of Forty-four and at Dog Soldiers, there seems to be a lot of redundancy, and in both cases, the redundancy don't deal directly with the article, but still important enough background information to put the article into context. If a separate Cheyenne military societies article were to be started, that article could have the necessary details, have the Council of Forty-four have a shorter share of the military societies but with a link, and within the new article, have a link to the Dog Soldiers article for more details, while shortening up the overall military societies discussion within the Dog Soldiers article with a link back to the larger Cheyenne military societies. What do you all think? CJLippert14:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes, there should be a separate article. It's been just a matter of time for me, because my plate's pretty full right now. --Yksin15:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
