This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine
A fact from Corynaea crassa appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Peruvian Viagra grows on the roots of plants?
Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Its been a while since I did one of these, wow. Strange plant with an even stranger common name, feel free to come up with an ALT hook using the name because I'm sure you all can come up with something much more interesting using the plant's strange name. I'll try and review something in the upcoming days, thank you in advance to the reviewer!
Overall: New enough, long enough and interesting. Correct inline citations and format. No copyright violations. The photo s good. Hook is verified . QPC is not needed since this is only the 3rd nomination that I can find but it is good that you helped out by reviewing one. Regarding the hook, it is interesting as it is, and I am not in favor of making some overt innuendo. It works now and allows the reader to interpret. Thank you for your contributions, you have written a good spate of articles. Bruxton (talk) 22:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
For transparency's sake I think this is actually my 9th nomination, just the first time for a long while. So I doubt QPQ applies to me anymore! Thank you so much for the kind words and thank you again for your review! Ornithoptera (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
New enough, long enough and interesting. Correct inline citations and format. No copyright violations. The photo s good. Hook is verified . QPC is not needed since this is only the 3rd nomination that I can find but it is good that you helped out by reviewing one. Regarding the hook, it is interesting as it is, and I am not in favor of making some overt innuendo. It works now and allows the reader to interpret. Thank you for your contributions, you have written a good spate of articles. Bruxton (talk) 22:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)