Talk:Corrosion in space

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Usually moving parts on spacecrafts are protected and as such not affected atomic oxygen. The atomic oxygen flux to interiour parts of a spacecreaft is very low and the initial 5 eV energy of the atomic oxygen is lost due to scattering. The materials affected most are those in the ram direction. They see the maximum flux.
Indeed different materials resist corrosion in space differently. It is, however, not aluminium that is to worry about. Interesting enough it is silver that is the most vulnerable metal in low earth orbit and copper to a much lesser extend. Silver oxidises so fast that it is forbidden to use at the outside of spacecrafts in low earth orbit. Silver was used in the past as interconnectors on solar arrays. It is now replaced by molybdenum (silver plated) or gold.
There are more materials which are affected in such a way that they not used anymore at the outside of low earth orbit spacecrafts. One of the materails, which used as a reference in ground testing, while it erodes very fast, is kapton.
--Tderooij 16:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corrosion in space. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply