Talk:Corfe Castle (village)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Corfe Castle (village) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Fortifications / Technology / British / European / Medieval / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums B‑class Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dorset C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

First comment

Purportedly?

Even then we kept track of where kings were killed, didn't we?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Midgley (talk • contribs) 23:55, 8 July 2005

Photos

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have uploaded three photos showing the Corfe Castle-dominated gap in the Purbeck Hills but am not sure which one best illustrates the article (I used Image:Corfe Castle gap 2.JPG, but maybe 3 is better as it shows the length of the hills best)

Jasper33 (talk) 22:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Picture of mine added showing scaffolding of corfe castle Megatonman (talk) 16:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Split into Corfe Village and Corfe Castle

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This article really needs splitting into Corfe Village and Corfe Castle, I can't believe someone hasn't mentioned it already. The castle and the village are seperate entities, which should have been made obvious by the sheer amount of categories it's currently filling. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'd agree, it's a bit confusing as it is.

One problem I can see though is both village and castle have the same name; we could have a Corfe Castle (village) and Corfe Castle (castle) page I suppose. What say you? Moonraker12 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC).Reply

It's been a couple of months and there wasn't any other comment here, so I've been bold and done it; I trust that's all right with everyone. Moonraker12 (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dorset WikiProject assessment - proposed change

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I propose changing the above WikiProject's 'importance' rating of this article from 'High' to 'Mid', the reason being that this article is only concerned with the village - the castle (which I agree is of high importance) has its own article. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Misleading

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Corfe Castle and Corfe Castle, Dorset. Most people from farther away know the castle and fewer know the settlement. This should be village. I mean, the castle is still in Dorset, not somewhere else. Hoof (talk) 19:06, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Struck out sock. bobrayner (talk) 05:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Official Name

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is the official name of the village Corfe or Corfe Castle? The website http://corfe-castle.co.uk always mentions "Corfe". --87.149.37.218 (talk) 08:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm familiar only with the "Corfe Castle" form. Toccata quarta (talk) 09:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 12 April 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved with unanimous support. At the nominator's suggestion, Corfe Castle, Dorset will be redirected to the castle itself. Xoloz (talk) 01:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Corfe Castle, Dorset → Corfe Castle (village) – Both the castle and village are called "Corfe Castle", and both are located in Dorset. Therefore "Corfe Castle, Dorset" is itself ambiguous and could equally apply to both of them. The term used for disambiguation should actually be unambiguous, and (village) does that.

The castle is at the base name as primary topic, and IMO that's correct. If moved Corfe Castle, Dorset should be redirected to either the castle or the dab. Nilf anion (talk) 22:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support As per nominator. The current titling is confusing. I note however that the article has briefly been titled as per the proposal before, but was rapidly changed to the current situation - see these 2 changes. Not sure why that should have happened, or if it has any implications for this time round? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 22:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom, Wikipedia's practice of using the comma form to distinctly distinguish communities from other locations using parentheses is very parochial, requiring knowledge of Wikipedia's internal notations (and at variance with local norms in other places in the world where paren forms are normal for communities), instead of being disambiguous, which is what page titles should be. I suggest the disambiguation page be made primary. --
Suppport Per wp:precise, avoid ambiguity with the castle. ^walk victor falk^talk 15:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Support per nominator's eloquent reasoning. --ELEKHH^T 12:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic