Talk:Continuous simulation

I find it deeply ironic that this page has been slated for deletion due to "Article is unreferenced, unintelligible to a general audience and does not make any clear assertion of notability." Continuous Simulation is one of the first uses ever put to computers. Continuous simulation allows prediction of rocket trajectories. No Apollo moon shot would have been possible without it. Continuous simulation is what you find inside WII stations, commercial flight simulators, and advanced engineering design tools. Modern circuit design and technology that we enjoy today would not be possible without continuous simulation. If this is unintelligible to a general audience, and that is a requirement to avoid deletion, I can think of a large number of much more obscure mathematical pages that should be put in the knowledge pyre and burned as well.

Previous unsigned comment was from DigitalPower expert, who also wrote this on the article page:

Editorial Note

I find it deeply ironic that this page has been slated for deletion due to "Article is unreferenced, unintelligible to a general audience and does not make any clear assertion of notability."

Having read the article, I think that with some work it is in fact, notable, but will need to be fixed up a bit.DSP-user (talk) 20:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Jane - I just spent 2 freaking hour putting in references and now they are all GONE! Not even found in the page history. This is utter bullshit. Excuse my french. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DigitalPowerExpert (talk • contribs) 20:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Edits don't magically disappear for no reason. Q ^{T C} 20:57, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Well if you can give me a reason, I'll be happy to hear it overlordQ —Preceding unsigned comment added by DigitalPowerExpert (talk • contribs) 21:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

You didn't hit save. You hit save but there was an edit conflict and didn't resave. You hit save but your session was lost, and so on. Q ^{T C} 21:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you overlordQ. Please explain how after I hit save I saw the page intact with all edits, then made even an additional edit, saved again, page was fine, then after about 10 minutes I went back tot he page and all edits were gone. No history in history page. Either Wiki software is damaged, or some administrator has a bug up his/her butt regarding continuous simulation. either way, I am not wasting any more time on this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DigitalPowerExpert (talk • contribs) 21:14, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Actually I do see 6 references in the history.DSP-user (talk) 21:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

OK I take it back, Wiki did save my edits. I guess I must have hit history on the TALK page and thought it was the main page. As Rosanne Rosannadanna says "nevermind". I've restored my edits minus the editorial comment. Now the wiki minions can whack away at it.--DigitalPowerExpert (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I would prefer to be called overlord, but OK, I'll have a go at it.DSP-user (talk) 21:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my refs OQ. Question, why did my reference button above the edit window disappear? --DigitalPowerExpert (talk) 22:21, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Continuous simulation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609000757/http://www.cs.uu.nl/docs/vakken/sim/continuous.pdf to http://www.cs.uu.nl/docs/vakken/sim/continuous.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)