This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments3 people in discussion
@David Gerard: You reverted the restoration changes by asking to take to DRV. Is it because you found the new changes controversial, necessiating DRV, or is this the process you follow for redirects created as a result of an AfD? Jay 💬14:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
fair enough that the AFD was a while ago. Though looking at the text as it was, I honestly thought it was just promotional. It seriously lacked independent third-party mainstream WP:RSes - it was substantially primary sources, fringe blogs and sources found generally unreliable and noted as such at WP:RSP such as New American. "Independent Political Report" seems to be a blog, and has been ill-regarded at WP:RSN, though that was a while ago. The Star Trek Blog is also unlikely to count as evidence of notability. Is there actually evidence that the NC branch of the party has sufficient demonstrable notability to rate a separate article and not just a redirect? Keeping in mind that notability is not WP:INHERITed from the main party - David Gerard (talk) 17:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I was also gonna add information about the party filing Articles of impeachment against Roy Cooper back in 2020 and information about the party conventions the party has held in previous years (including the upcoming 2023 party convention). Average Ninja (talk) 11:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
did those make it to independent RSes though? It needs more than primary sources. Political party articles have to justify themselves the same way any organisation article does under Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).
I saw some RS coverage of their successful fight against NC's "sore loser" law, that gets a possible article up to a few more sentences ... - David Gerard (talk) 15:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
There was some coverage about demands for impeachment against Roy Cooper back in 2020. Though the coverage about that was mainly led by ReOpenNC, which I don't believe is related to the Constitution Party. Both groups did seek to demand removal of the governor around the same time in response to the governor's mask mandates, which both groups claimed was unconstitutional. Average Ninja (talk) 21:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply