Talk:Connecticut Route 190/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • Street names should not be italicized in the route description.

   Done. --Rschen7754 03:19, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

   • The route description has a lot of "At x miles...". These should be removed.
   • The sentence "In the 1932 state highway renumbering, modern Route 190 was created, incorporating old State Highway 303, with a westward extension via the village of West Suffield to the Congamond Notch in the town of Southwick, Massachusetts. " sounds long and choppy.
   • The junction list needs a legend to indicate what the concurrency colors mean.

   Done. --Rschen7754 03:19, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • Reference 3 needs an access date.
   • References 6 and 8 are Self-published sources and need to be replaced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   • The lead could use more detail as to provide a summary of the route.
   • The route description could use more information about the physical surroundings.
   • Counties need to be added to the junction list.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I will put this article on hold for fixes to be made. Dough4872 02:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

It has been a week and since all the issues have not been addressed I will have to delist the article. Dough4872 02:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)