Talk:Conexpo-Con/Agg
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Fuortu in topic Requested move 21 November 2016
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 21 November 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 21:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Conexpo-Con/Agg → CONEXPO-CON/AGG – proper capitalization Fireflyfanboy (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:TMRULES since the entire title is not an acronym. Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose MOS:TMRULES not an acronym. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.