 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Two uses? Use a hatnote (per WP:TWODABS) Born2cycle (talk) 05:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
editComplete linkage → Complete linkage (genetics) — So that a disambiguation page can be created to find this article OR Complete-linkage clustering. Marcusogden (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. Unnecessary disambiguation. Use a hatnote instead. PC78 (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support. The first line of complete-linkage clustering calls it just "complete linkage", and that's what I've heard it referred to, so it would appear that the "clustering" part of that article title is acting as a non-standard discriminator. Neither seems to be an obvious primary term and so I think there should be a disambiguation page as proposed. I'd also support moving Complete-linkage clustering to Complete linkage (clustering) or similar. Dpmuk (talk) 11:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.