Talk:Commentaries on the Laws of England
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from William Blackstone was copied or moved into Commentaries on the Laws of England on May 26, 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Analogy
editMaster: servant as employer:employee:) funny analogy. Me like.
Um it's the law, not a joke.
It should be noted, when he discusses the Rights of Husbands and Wives, it's really the Rights of Husbands until they're passing... Then it's the Rights of the King. (Pg. 139) Pseymour24 (talk) 16:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Quotations
editSuggest that these should be placed in wikiqoute. James500 (talk) 10:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Treatment of Catholics
editIt would be interesting if the article could provide more context on Blackstone's explanation of British laws on recusant Catholics. ADM (talk) 11:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- As to papists, what has been said of the Protestant dissenters would hold equally strong for a general toleration of them; provided their separation was founded only upon difference of opinion in religion, and their principles did not also extend to a subversion of the civil government. If once they could be brought to renounce the supremacy of the pope, they might quietly enjoy their seven sacraments, their purgatory, and auricular confession; their worship of relics and images; nay even their transubstantiation. But while they acknowledge a foreign power, superior to the sovereignty of the kingdom, they cannot complain if the laws of that kingdom will not treat them upon the footing of good subjects..
- — Bl. Comm. IV, c.4 ss. iii.2, p. *54
Comment on Blackstone
editInteresting comment on Blackstone himself, seen in changes to his famous work, as worked upon by his contemporaries. Not complimentary, that. Shenme (talk) 02:05, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Size of books
editSince much is made of how convenient the four books were, it would be good to give their six. How big were they? Wis2fan (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- I found the books on Amazon, summed the page count, and added it to the Legacy section, citing the Amazon page. JamesCurran (talk) 22:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Add A Fact: "Evolution of English common law"
editI found a fact that might belong in this article. See the quote below
At the same time, however, Blackstone acknowledged the fact that the English common law had developed over time and had changed as an “intermixture of adventitious nations, the Romans, the Picts, the Saxons, the Danes, and the Normans … must have insensibly introduced and incorporated many of their own customs with those that were before established.”
The fact comes from the following source:
Here is a wikitext snippet to use as a reference:
{{Cite web |title="Time Immemorial": Stinneford on the Age of Legal Practices |url=https://humanperson.law.edu/time-immemorial-stinneford-on-the-age-of-legal-practices/ |website=Center for Law and the Human Person |date=2024-07-01 |access-date=2024-09-28 |language=en-US |first=Marc |last=DeGirolami |quote=At the same time, however, Blackstone acknowledged the fact that the English common law had developed over time and had changed as an “intermixture of adventitious nations, the Romans, the Picts, the Saxons, the Danes, and the Normans … must have insensibly introduced and incorporated many of their own customs with those that were before established.”}}
Additional comments from user: (First time using Add-A-Fact extension sorry, I was gonna put this first on time immemorial then tried this
This post was generated using the Add A Fact browser extension.
~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 22:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Here is a more direct source, and wonderful site: NLNRAC --~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 22:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)