Talk:Comac C929

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Wingspan

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't know the real number, but a wingspan of 360ft (110m) is extremely unlikely because no airport gates, runways or taxiways exist anywhere in the world to accommodate such an aircraft. ICAO Annex 14 on airport design lists gates up to category F (wingspan 65-80m). The A380, the world's largest civilian airliner, has an 80m wingspan for exactly that reason. Boeing's upcoming 777X (a much larger aircraft than the CR929) will have folding wingtips to fit within the 80m box. A CR929 with 110m wings would simply not be permitted to fly anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.36.155 (talk) 10:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Indeed. It was in the AIN ref and I asked AIN to clarify that 30 months ago, with no reply. I deleted it. Its wingspan should fit in the ICAO#Aerodrome Reference Code E (65 m), like all modern widebodies (777, 787, 777X [not 80m with wingtips folded], A330/330neo, A350), as specified in == Specs == with an AvWeek ref.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 11:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Article did not develop(?) between 2018 and 2022

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There was a little rumble in between - and how about the lead of the article if you read: The news seems to come in direct contrast to previous announcements claiming that construction of the aircraft had already begun in 2021.

And about the engine https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/china-xi-jinping-communist-party-congress/card/one-problem-with-xi-s-big-aviation-plans-where-s-the-engine--LkQt5rc46a9EKukOzFUE and https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/16481537 Regards --Anidaat (talk) 16:46, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

New photo reflecting the COMAC C929 branding

Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I just swung by the Singapore Airshow and managed to get 2 shots of the C929 model in the Comac only livery at the Comac booth. File:(SGP-Singapore) Comac C929 model @ Singapore Airshow 2024-02-25 (1).jpg and File:(SGP-Singapore) Comac C929 model @ Singapore Airshow 2024-02-25 (2).jpg. If anyone wants to make them the infobox picture please feel free to do it. I'm not gonna do it myself because of the non-transparent background (that I'm frankly lazy to remove. _{My photoshop skills are not the best}). S5A-0043^Talk 09:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. I posted a request onto Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop. S5A-0043^Talk 06:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic