Talk:Columbia Township, Lorain County, Ohio

Flight 93 RfC

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The article states that United Flight 93 veered off-course precisely over Columbia Township. However, looking at the map provided, it doesn't look like it. It appears as on the border of Columbia and Olmsted Townships, and not just Columbia. The map also appears to be a rough estimate, so there's no real telling that the plane actually veered off-course over Columbia Township, and there's no other sources (that I'm aware of at least) that show/state otherwise. In fact, I'm wondering if it's even notable enough for a place in the article (it probably is, for simply being 9/11-related, but still). Should the sentence in question be removed or should it be kept? Pyrotle…the "y" is silent, BTW. 04:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

It doesnt appear to be particular notable to the township, I would suggest just removing it. MilborneOne (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

At least delete "precisely". (Editor "randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment") --BoogaLouie (talk) 17:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

I removed the word "precisely"; however, there's still the question on whether the line should be kept or not, as per what I said above. Pyrotle…the "y" is silent, BTW. 23:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Simple case of WP:BURDEN, if the map is the only reliable source, than a request for additional reliable sources doesn't appear to be uncalled for. Also, should it be given weight in the lead? Perhaps if it is verifiable by multiple reliable sources it can be in the history section, if at all.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Remove the line, I reckon, unless a source can be found that directly supports the claim. And I couldn't find such a source. Drawing a conclusion from the map cited as the source is original research and highly liable to be inaccurate. --Mkativerata (talk) 10:06, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Remove entirely It's not likely to be true, there's no evidence it's been commented on enough to warrant any weight in the article at all. Seems to be speculative SPACKlick (talk) 14:40, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Remove it There is nothing to support the statement, take it out. JamesBay (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Remove unless a reliable source is found supporting this. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 05:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Columbia Township, Lorain County, Ohio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.loraincountymetroparks.com/columbia.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120000553/http://www.blackbrookaudubon.org/hushwing/fall2004.html to http://www.blackbrookaudubon.org/hushwing/fall2004.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725041903/http://www.kirtlandbirdclub.org/local_trip_reports/columbia_reservation_10112003.htm to http://www.kirtlandbirdclub.org/local_trip_reports/columbia_reservation_10112003.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Columbia Township, Lorain County, Ohio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011070901/http://blog.cleveland.com/earlyedition/2007/06/columbia_twp_celebrates_bicent.html to http://blog.cleveland.com/earlyedition/2007/06/columbia_twp_celebrates_bicent.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)