Talk:Colehill

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

This page is now being watched for vandalism and offenders will be reported.

Bear with me - I am trying to make the page more readable and convey some interesting information. Giddylaker (talk) 19:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not convinced that the entry about Rikishi should be on the Colehill page. The only information I can find is not authoritative.Bwalmisley (talk) 16:44, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Notable residents

edit

It seems we have an IP-hopping editor who since December 2007 has been determined to include the claim that the professional wrestler Rikishi is a resident of Colehill:

This will be reverted as vandalism unless a reliable source is provided to support this. Barret (talk) 22:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dorset WikiProject assessments

edit

Despite the parish of Colehill having a sizeable population, I have judged this article as being of 'Low' importance to the Dorset WikiProject, as Colehill is effectively a suburb of Wimborne Minster and has only local significance. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 11:48, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colehill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply