Talk:Cognitive inhibition
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Mytheory in topic McCulloch early contribution to neural inhibition?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cognitive inhibition article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
McCulloch early contribution to neural inhibition?
editShould we mention McCulloch's early contribution in that field? He contributed to early cybernetics. "McCulloch bubbled with ideas. In one co-written paper, 'A Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity' (W. S. McCulloch and W. Pitts Bull. Math. Biophys. 5, 115–133; 1943), he argued that neurons must be capable of inhibition as well as excitation. If not, they would compute only a very small class of 'monotonic' functions. McCulloch told me that neurophysiologists of his time rejected this idea because inhibition had never been observed. His prediction — that inhibition exists in the brain — was later proved experimentally." from an article in nature. Mytheory (talk) 22:04, 24 December 2022 (UTC)