Talk:Cognitive genomics

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Article issues

edit

This article suffers from huge problems. It looks like a class assignment rather than an encyclopedic article. Apart from weird assertions (like the one on autism suggesting that there are just two genes involved), the article is incredibly unbalanced, contains lots of stuff that doesn't belong here (the section on species, the section on disorders, the section on imaging genomics, etc). The reerences contain weird links (that llok like lin ks to the hadr drive of the person who started this article). Of course, there aren't that many sources, because "cognitive genomics" is not rally a very current expression. --Randykitty (talk) 19:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cognitive genomics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply