This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Elizabeth Parsons was caught engaging in fraud only once, and that was on the night that she was told that unless the ghost manifested that night, her parents were going to prison. That is strong motivation for fraud, even if it had never been committed previously. In addition, the witnesses that night commented that the raps sounded different than they ever had before---they sounded like they were coming from Elizabeth's bed, whereas always before, they had emanated from around the room. Given these facts, I believe that it's erroneous to claim that this case has been proven fraudulent, and although I know that it is common (but erroneous) to state that it was, I object to it in this article. 2600:6C5D:5A00:B1D:CDE6:F417:35D9:A70E (talk) 22:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Wilson, Colin, "Poltergeist! A Study In Destructive Haunting", London, New English Library, 1981
The book has an extensive bibliography, but only one title specifically refers to the Cock Lane ghost: Grant, Douglas, "The Cock Lane Ghost", London, Toronto, and New York, Macmillan & Co., Ltd., 1965.
It states in this very article that the only time Elizabeth Parsons was caught in fraud was the night she was told that unless there were knockings that night, she and her father would be committed to Newgate Prison. Of course, having been told that, she made sure there were knockings that night. Poltergeists don't perform on command, she knew that, and she was not willing to take the chance.
The fact that they don't perform on command was the only other so-called "evidence" for fraud. At times, the knocking didn't happen when people wanted it to. That doesn't prove the case was fraud or a hoax.
This was not a hoax. It was a poltergeist. That, of course, does not mean that the phenemona were caused by the deceased Fanny Lynes and it does not mean that the allegations made against William Kent were true. Poltergeists, in the cases in which they have communicated with humans, have not been known to be truthful. Poltergeists are trouble-makers. This poltergeist was particularly and wildly successful at creating trouble for its victim, Richard Parsons. 2600:6C5D:5A00:B1D:A830:DB06:CBB1:B81A (talk) 11:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
