Talk:Cochlear Limited/Talk header test

neutral point of view + copyright

I tagged the article ; whereas the "controversy" section provides a counterbalance, the whole "History" section is just repeating http://www.cochlear.com/au/corporate/about-graeme-clark --Example1 05:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cochlear.com/corporate/about-graeme-clark. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Example2 ^(talk) 16:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Company Formation

Is it appropriate to add some information relating to the formation of the company here. For example stating what led to the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia to fund the research work that led to the commercially available products sold today and what payback resulted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Example3 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk header test response

Mathglot, this looks good to me! Ideally, in the final implementation, both boxes would be similarly formatted with or without an icon. Medtronic is a real-world example if you're still looking for a live page to test. - Wikmoz (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

@Wikmoz:, good point. We should probably copy & move this discussion somewhere, as this is a talk subpage that is only temporary, and subject to deletion at any time. Mathglot (talk) 03:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

@Mathglot:... Feel free to delete. Would it be possible to do a trial rollout of the initial solution so we can start kicking the tires in the real world? We had consensus to move forward. We could then use Medtronic to test the stacked RS link sets. I can kick off a conversation on a template talk page to discuss the approach. - Wikmoz (talk) 04:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

@Wikmoz:, yes, soon; I'm still in jet-lag after a trip, will want to be fully alert for this. For the record, I assume you're referring to Module talk:Find sources#Multiple RS link sets in a single topic. Mathglot (talk) 16:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

@Mathglot:, yes. That's the one. - Wikmoz (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)