Talk:Clayton Utz

POV

This article is a blatant breach of NPOV and makes a series of claims without any citations. The firm is notable and has been involved in a series of notable cases and is a good candidate for an article, but given the above, if it is not substantially improved I feel it should be nominated for deletion.--Mattinbgn/ ^talk 02:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

The article has been amended now. --Iamlh 06:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The claims are cited, and to a very respectable and neutral - the Australian ABC. So I'm not quite sure what the problem is, as this is the main case most Australians would know of Clayton Utz, I feel it is important to mention it and the criticism of CU, just as the criticisms of most other organisations are mentioned. Now surely, they are not placed in the best place of the article and perhaps could be worded better - but I dont see how simply removing it is a solution? Why not actually fix the problem instead of just censoring it? Colourinthemeaning (talk) 06:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Colourinthemeaning, your content is still included and has been elaborated on. See Significant legal work - it includes all the major cited points made in your earlier revision. I'm undoing your blanket deletion on these grounds. Codrington (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

I've never heard of Clayten Utz until Masterchef... so I doubt most Australians would know of it outside the legal profession. This article sounds like an ad, the bengoshi reference should be linked to Attorneys in Japan page (I doubt the layperson would understand what a bengoshi's significance is). Oodas Squyeemo (talk) 01:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clayton Utz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150821082851/http://www.claytonutz.com:80/about/clayton_utz_offices.page to https://www.claytonutz.com/about/clayton_utz_offices.page

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)