Talk:City of Casey

	Australia portal City of Casey is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Do you think that all councillors should get an article? Jeffklib 04:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I do not think they are really important enough. There wouldn't be much to say on them in any case. --Crazycrazyduck 11:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Party affiliations

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have tagged the table of councillors (and mean to include the infobox with the council structure) as lacking a suitable source for the WP:BLP information about the councillor's party affiliations. The statement that someone has been a member of both liberal and labor does not automatically make them independent, any more than someone having sat in state parliament for one party 10 years before they were elected to the council means they still vote in that party bloc. This chart needs proper referencing for the current affiliations of the councillors. --Scott Davis ^Talk 01:58, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I'll try to find references. Give me some time, though. :) Orthogonal1 (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on City of Casey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020524142137/http://www.caseyarc.com.au/ to http://www.caseyarc.com.au/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.caseyfields.com.au/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061129061549/http://www.casey.vic.gov.au/myunafarm/ to http://www.casey.vic.gov.au/myunafarm/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070901105551/http://www.salvationarmy.org.au/theshed/ to http://www.salvationarmy.org.au/theshed/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic