Talk:Cinema of Asia/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Cinema of Asia. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Reliable sources for the term dharmic religions?
Where are the reliable sources that use the term dharmic religions in the context of this article? Dharmic religions is a now deleted obscure neologism and should not be used throughout Wikipedia. I propose to use the alternative phrase Indian religions. The number of google scholar results for "Indian religions"+"Indian religion" is (45.600 + 84.200) while it is only (492+475) for "dharmic religions" +"dharmic religion". See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_September_8. Andries 20:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Central Asian Cinema
Cinema of Uzbekistan needs to be added to the box in the article as part of Central Asian cinema.Nataev (talk) 18:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Lists
Considering this is a summary article of the variety of cinematic traditions of Asia, why is there a huge pile of lists at the beginning? Equivalent articles such as Cinema of Europe, Cinema of South America, etc. contains no such information. This is definitely not how you write or structure an encyclopedia article. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout.--DerechoReguerraz (talk) 02:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Where in WP:LIST or WP:EMBED does it suggest that embedded lists are unacceptable in prose articles? All it's saying is that if the information can be presented in prose rather than as a list, then it should be presented in prose, but if that's not possible, then it's acceptable to present it as an embedded list. If you have any issues with the way it's presented as a list, then you should consider tagging the sections rather than deleting them, since it's clearly the presentation you're complaining about rather than the content. Jagged 85 (talk) 05:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Chlod (say hi!) 21:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)