Talk:Cindy Lee Berryhill
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Refrigerator Heaven in topic Autobiography issues
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cindy Lee Berryhill article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Autobiography issues
editI have attempted to make the article at least a bit more neutral by adding more third person mentions of Berryhill.
- I was going to do that recently but got distracted by the BLP flap so that indicates some "consensus". I'm not certain the autobiography tag is still appropriate though the article certainly needs expansion. Refrigerator Heaven (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- I've reviewed the article history and "It is an autobiography, or has been extensively edited by the subject ..." doesn't seem accurate since the removal of material and the additon of material by other editors. I'm going to remove the tag. "... and may not conform to NPOV policy." could still be an issue if it is seperate from the first part of the sentence though I'm not sure what NPOV policy aspect(s) it wouldn't be conforming to at this time. Refrigerator Heaven (talk) 16:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Notability issues
editI feel this artist meets notability requirements. I don't think popularity should be the benchmark, rather the fact she has several album releases and is married to Mr. Williams is enough to require an article. 97.83.159.233 (talk) 09:24, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. I haven't gotten to it yet but she also seems notable as a musician, particularly in connection with the "anti-folk" genre/scene which I'm not very familiar with but recognize some of the musicians also connected to it. Some other reasons too. I even recognized one of her songs as something I've heard on the radio though I'd not known who the artist was before. Also the quote I cited by Unterberger is from a professional writing for a professional trade service with editorial control. This article's not high priority on my editing list (my immediate goal here is part of a desire to protect a few biographies from zealous BLP deletionists) but think there wouldn't be any question of notability issues if it were judging from what I've read in outside sources. Certainly more notable than the subjects of many much longer articles that seem to be long because the subjects are popular trivia IMO. Of course that's subjective, lots of people are notable and of great interest to many people for reasons of no interest to me. Refrigerator Heaven (talk) 11:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)