Talk:Chytridiomycota

new higher phylogenetics

According to Hibbett (see ref in article) Neocallimastigales and Monoblepharidales are now classes of their own within Chytridiomycota. I'm moving stuff around accordingly. Bendž|Ť 15:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

correction: Neocallimastigales in a new phylum Neocallimastigomycota Bendž|Ť 16:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Disease of Amphibians & Treatment for Frogs

These two sections should be deleted, and merged with the chytridiomycosis article.

Deleted vandalism

128.227.124.121 (talk) 18:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Too technical?

This article seems much too technical for the average reader (I don't understand much of it myself). Can a subject expert review it and make it more accessible? Also, the bit about it being very interesting should be removed: it is not encyclopaedic.

Cheers,

Danielklein (talk) 04:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Class editor doing copyright vio and has other difficulties contributing

I just removed this because part of it was a copyright violation of this. User:‎5e ext2013 has been asked multiple times to have their professor contact the education board for guidance on class projects. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Revisions

I plan on revising this wikipage if no one has any serious objections. I will be focusing on the "Habitat," "Reproduction," and "Parasite" sections. I might change "As a parasite" to "Ecological Roles" and talk about saprobic chytrids as well. I will also be updating some of the references. I think the "Spread of Chytrid Fungus" section should be re-located to the chytridiomycosis page. Chytrid Wm (talk) 00:42, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

The taxonomy has been updated with the proper citation and spellings. Wordings have been changed and references added to the introductory paragraphs. The "Habitat" section has been moved to be after the "Reproduction" section and both have been expanded and updated with "new" references. I plan on getting rid of the "Spread of Chytrid Fungus" section as this page is concerned with the whole phylum and not just a particular species. The "Ecological Functions" will be expanded. Am I correct in thinking a review article counts as a secondary source? I will be using a few of those in this section. I also hope to re-add the blurb about the mention of Chytridiomycota in Tom Clancy's book. That was previously removed since it was considered "trivia," and that may be valid. I find it interesting and relevant, though. Chytrid Wm (talk) 17:58, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chytridiomycota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123174320/http://bama.ua.edu/~nsfpeet/ to http://bama.ua.edu/~nsfpeet/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123174320/http://bama.ua.edu/~nsfpeet/ to http://bama.ua.edu/~nsfpeet/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131213024304/http://www.umaine.edu/chytrids/index.html to http://www.umaine.edu/chytrids/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070110154101/http://www.fnpw.org.au/ForSupporters/PAWS/enews062/FrogWipeOut.htm to http://www.fnpw.org.au/ForSupporters/PAWS/enews062/FrogWipeOut.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC)