Talk:Chromatiaceae

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

untitled

Lamprocystis needs disambiguation - it takes you to the molluscan genus of the same name.

Weird fysiology

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I find the fysiology a bit weird. Although the genus chromatium may well exclusively be phototrophs, I (and many with me) would be surprised if the nitrifier Nitrosoccus would be. Can someone verify what Bergey's really says on this? L.tak (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, it seems you are right, Nitrosoccus isn´t phototroph. Just my fault, I´m sorry about this. Bergey says about Nitrococcus:

Cells are spherical to ellipsoidal (Fig. BXII.c.10A). Typical Gram-negative cell wall, but some strains have additional layers composed of repeating subunits arranged in a molecular array (Watson and Remsen, 1969, 1970). Extensive intracytoplasmic membrane systems arranged centrally in the protoplasm (Fig.BXII.c.10B). Carboxysomes not observed. Obligate salt requirement. Urea can be used as ammonia source by one of the two described species. Motile cells possess a tuft of ﬂagella or a single ﬂagellum. Species are distributed in oceans and in salt lakes.

Nothing about phototroph. I also have nothing found about phototroph and Nitrosococcus by using google. First I have added the words "many" and "most" members. Of cause, it would be great if you would add some more details. I´m not realy an expert in microbiology... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dodshe (talk • contribs) 09:58, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chromatiaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120302234343/http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/c/chromatiaceae.html to http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/c/chromatiaceae.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic